Saturday, November 10, 2018

Archaeologists find clues that female king ruled in Canaan





Who was this female ruler, considered in this article to be a Canaanite personage of the mid-C14th BC - but, in out (AMAIC) scheme, needing to be re-dated to the approximate era of El Amarna?



Tel Aviv University archaeologists have uncovered evidence that a mysterious woman ruled the ancient town of Beit Shemesh when it was part of Canaan around 1350 BCE, before the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt and their return to their homeland.
Shlomo Bunimovitz and Zvi Lederman of the department of archaeology and ancient Near Eastern civilizations recently found an unusual ceramic plaque of a goddess in female dress, suggesting that a mighty female “king” may have ruled the city. If true, they say, the plaque showed the only known female ruler of the region.
The plaque itself presents a royal, supposedly male figure and deities that once appeared in Egyptian and Canaanite art. The figure’s hairstyle, though, is feminine and its bent arms are holding lotus flowers, which is uncharacteristic of men.
Art historians suggest that the plaque may be an artistic representation of the “Mistress of the Lionesses,” a female Canaanite ruler who was known to have sent letters to the Pharaoh in Egypt reporting unrest in her kingdom and calling for help.
“We took the image to an art historian who confirmed our hypothesis that the figure was a female,” says Lederman. “Obviously something very different was happening in this city.
“We may have found the ‘Mistress of the Lionesses’ who’d been sending letters from Canaan to Egypt. The destruction we uncovered at the site last summer, along with the plaque, may just be the key to the puzzle.”


Archaeologists dig at an excavation site near where evidence was uncovered that a woman ruled the ancient town of Beit Shemesh.

Around 1350 BCE, there was unrest in the region, and Canaanite kings expressed their fears using clay tablet “letters” to the Egyptian pharaoh, asking for military assistance. But among all the correspondence by kings were two rare and unusual letters among the 382 el-Amarna tablets uncovered by Egyptian farmers a few decades ago.
The two letters came from a “Mistress of the Lionesses” in Canaan. She wrote that groups of bandits and rebels had entered the region and that her city might be endangered. Because the el-Amarna tablets were found in Egypt rather than Canaan, historians have tried to trace the origin of the tablets.
“The big question became, ‘What city did she rule?” the researchers said.
Lederman and Bunimovitz believe that she served as king (rather than queen, which at the time described the wife of a male king) over a city of about 1,500 residents. A few years ago, Tel Aviv University professor Nadav Naaman suggested that she might have ruled the city of Beit Shemesh, but there has been no proof until now.
“The city had been violently destroyed in a way we rarely see in archaeology,” says Bunimovitz, who points to many exotic finds buried under the destruction, including an Egyptian royal seal, bronze arrowheads and complete large storage vessels.
They suggest a large and important city-state, well enmeshed within east Mediterranean geopolitical and economic networks.
The archaeologists say the new finds might turn the interpretation of prebiblical history on its head. The people of the time were pagans who had a very elaborate religious system.
“It was a very well-to-do city,” says Lederman. “Strangely, such extensive destruction like what we found in our most recent dig is a great joy for archaeologists because people would not have had time to take their belongings. They left everything in their houses. The site is loaded with finds,” he says, adding that the expensive items found in the recent level marks it as one the most important inland Canaanite cities.
The discovery of the plaque, and the evidence of destruction recorded in the el-Amarna tablets, could confirm that the woman depicted in the figurine was the mysterious “Mistress of the Lionesses” and ruled Canaanite Beit Shemesh.
“There is no evidence of other females ruling a major city in this capacity,” Lederman and Bunimovitz say. “She is the only one. We really hope to find out more about her this summer.”

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Fire Falling from Heaven: Elijah and the Miracle of Fatima



by

Damien F. Mackey

  

Today is the 13th of June (2018), and I am always well aware of the 13th day of the month, from May to October, as being the key dates of the 1917 Fatima (Portugal) apparitions of our Lady of the Rosary.

This morning at Mass the Old Testament reading, from 1st Kings, was, most appropriately, the fiery account of the prophet Elijah’s contest with the priests of Ba’al on mount Carmel. Though this text has often been likened to the Fatima Miracle of the Sun which occurred on the 13th of October 1917, the Mass being celebrated today was actually in honour of the (albeit Portuguese born) very popular St. Anthony of Padua. I was listening intently to the gripping reading, so full of biting irony against the Ba’alists - and not connecting it to Fatima - until, at its dramatic conclusion of fire coming down from heaven to consume the offerings, and licking the water in the troughs, my mind reverted to the Fatima miracle of a downwards spiralling sun and the water from the incessant rain suddenly drying.


Firstly, let us recall what happened on the 13th day of June 1917, as I wrote about it in my book:


The Five First Saturdays Of Our Lady of Fatima




The Second Apparition: 13th of June


On the 13th of June, the feast of St. Anthony, Our Lady again asked the children to recite the Rosary:


“I want you to say the Rosary every day”.


During this apparition, the central massage of which was the need for reparative devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, there was no lack of symbolism of a biblical nature, nor lack even of miraculous phenomena. The Blessed Virgin Mary appeared as usual over the little holm-oak tree, with Her feet resting on a small cloud; but this time, as Lucia recalled, there was a star with points of intense brightness at Her feet. On statues of Our Lady of Fatima today, this star is always represented on Our Lady’s dress just above Her feet. We might recall that at Lourdes the Blessed Virgin Mary had appeared with golden roses on Her feet. “But why on Her feet?”, asks Fr. Smolenski. The answer that he gives to his own question, as follows, may also explain why Our Lady of Fatima had a star at Her feet: “Then I came across this passage in Isaiah: “how beautiful on the mountains, are the feet of one who brings good news, who heralds peace, brings happiness, proclaims salvation, and tells Sion ‘Your God is king!’” (Isaiah 52:7). So it seems that Mary chose scriptural imagery – like a window in a church – to explain Her purpose and identity”. (Immaculata magazine, May 1982, p. 10).


As for the star itself, even Lucia said that she did not know what it was meant to signify. But Francis Johnston (In Fatima: the Great Sign) has made the intriguing suggestion that this star may be meant to remind us of Queen Esther, whose name is thought to derive from the Persian word for “star”. Even more precisely, it is the morning star. And it is most appropriate therefore that the Lady of Light always came to the Cova da Iria, like the morning star from the east; and afterwards She disappeared in the light of the sun towards the east. She had come to signal the dispersion of darkness, and to herald light and peace”.


“Continue, my children, reciting the Rosary every day, to obtain peace for the world. (13th of May, 1917).


Given what we have already leaned about Fatima, there is a good likelihood that one may be on the right track in looking to discover the significance of the star by its having some symbolic connection with the Book of Esther. The legitimacy of such an approach may, in this case, receive some further support from the fact that, during the 13th of June apparition, even nature itself seemed under constraint to testify that a royal Person had come on that day to the Cova da Iria. For thus we read in More About Fatima (p. 20):


“The day was bright and hot as it usually is in Portugal in the month of June. Now, during the entire period of the apparition the light of the sun was dimmed in an exceptional manner, without any apparent cause. At the same time, the topmost branches of the tree were bent in the form of a parasol, and remained thus as if an invisible weight had come to rest upon them…”.


Then, during the departure of this royal Visitor from Heaven, this ‘New Queen Esther’, we read that:


“… the onlookers saw rise from the tree a beautiful white cloud which they could follow with their eyes for quite a while as it moved in the direction of the East. Further, at the Lady’s departure, the upper branches of the tree, without losing the curved shape of a parasol, leaned towards the East, as if in going away the Lady’s dress had trailed over them. And this double pressure which had bent the branches, first into a curve and then towards the East, was so great that the branches remained like this for long hours, and only slowly resumed their normal position”.


Even the bright day-star itself must remain dim in the presence of the Queen of Heaven, who is “more resplendent than the sun”. And the branches of the holm-oak must bow in Her honour as She passes by, on Her way towards the presence of the King. It is an image already evoked in Psalm 44, in the glorification of the royal princess:


“All the glory of the king’s daughter is within, clothed with gold-woven robes; in many-coloured robes she is led to the king, with her virgin companions, her escort, in her train”. (vv. 13-14).


Almighty God chose to make the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary itself the very focal point of the 13th of June apparition. Lucia, later recalling the extraordinary grace that Heaven had deigned to bestow upon her and her little companions that day, said that the Lady, after speaking to them at some length about Her Immaculate Heart, then stretched forth Her hands, throwing on the children rays of immense light in which they saw themselves as if immersed in God.


“The Blessed Virgin held in Her right hand a Heart surrounded by thorns, which pierced it from all sides”.

The seers understood that it was the Immaculate Heart of Mary, afflicted by all the sins of the world, which demanded penance and reparation. Said Lucia:


“It seems to me, that on that day, the purpose of the light was to pour into us a special knowledge and love of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, as on other occasions it infused into us the knowledge and love of God, and the mystery of the Blessed Trinity. From that day, indeed, we experienced a more ardent love for the Immaculate Heart of Mary”. (“More About Fatima”, p. 88).

 
On this occasion Lucia, Jacinta and Francisco, who had been called by Our Lady to the sublime vocation of making known to the world the devotion of reparation to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, were even granted the privilege of gazing momentarily in vision upon Her most pure Heart – the very embodiment of the devotion. Jacinta and Francisco’s time though for spreading this devotion on earth, before being taken up into Heaven, would be short. But not so for Lucia; for, as Our Lady told her,


“You must remain longer on earth. Jesus wishes to use you in making Me known and loved. He wishes to spread in the world the devotion to My Immaculate Heart. I promise salvation to those who embrace this devotion. Their souls will be loved by God with a love of predilection, like flowers placed by Me before His throne”. (Ibid., p. 86).


An when Lucia appeared sad at the thought of having to remain alone on earth after the death of her two companions, Our Lady consoled Her by saying:


“No, my child, I shall never abandon you. My Immaculate Heart will be your refuge and the way that will lead you to God”. (Ibid.) ….




For a better appreciation of the irony and sarcasm hurled against the priests of Ba’al by the prophet Elijah, one could do no better than to read Leah Bronner’s The stories of Elijah and Elisha as polemics against baal worship (Leiden, E. J. Brill, 1968).


Many suggested comparisons between Elijah’s fire from heaven and the Fatima miracle can be found on the Internet. Here are a few interesting ones taken from:



It seems that Heaven has confirmed Our Lady at Fatima in the same mission of the prophet Elijah. Our Lady at Fatima appearing in her Carmelite habit with a similar fire from Heaven during the miracle of the sun. The stupendous Fatima Miracle is the Greatest Supernatural Event of the 20th Century and does not belong to faith or science it is an Historical Event! 


The Miracle of the Sun authenticated Fatima as supernatural in origin and also is a prefigurement or warning of a future catastrophe if the simple requests made at Fatima by our Lady are not heeded. ….


And:


Lourdes and Fatima belong to a long line of Approved Marian Apparitions leading back to the founding of the Carmelite Order on Mt Carmel by the Prophet Elijah. Here Elijah battled 450 priests of Baal in a public spiritual contest which led to their defeat and ruin. He challenged the people to stop hobbling first on one foot and then on the other but to choose who is God in Israel Yahweh or Baal. According to the story, which can be found in the First Book of Kings, chapter 18, Elijah’s sacrifice was consumed by fire from heaven and proved to the people that Yahweh was the true God. Is it possible God is sending his Mother the Queen of prophets to help us defeat the prophets of Baal resurrected in our own time. ….


And, perhaps in connection with: “The Blessed Virgin Mary appeared as usual over the little holm-oak tree, with Her feet resting on a small cloud …”:


Elijah ascended Mount Carmel to pray to God for the salvation of the Israel which was suffering a terrible drought at that time. Elijah "Casting himself down upon the earth he put his face between his knees." 1 Kings 18:42. He sent his servant seven times higher up the mountaintop to look for rain. Elijah, never wavered in his confidence, and received the good news on the seventh try. ….

….

Soon thereafter, torrential rains fell upon the parched land and the people of Israel were saved. Later an austere community of hermits followed Elijah and prayed in expectation of the advent of a Virgin-Mother who would bring salvation to mankind. They also saw the cloud as a symbol of the Virgin who would become the mother of the Messiah and made it their spiritual mission to pray for the advent of the Virgin.

              

….


The identification with the Mystery of Mt. Carmel is even more apparent. Mary came transported upon a cloud from the east similar to the … cloud rising from the ocean that Elijah saw that eventually inundated the earth with life giving rain ending a severe draught. Could this, along with other mysteries still hidden within the drama of Fatima, Signify a Second Advent with Mary?  Fatima seems to announce the Second Advent Mary as seen in the 12th chapter of the book of Revelation: The woman clothed with the sun the moon under her feet, and who with the help of God, prepares the church to meet Christ in his second advent his glorious second coming.


In relation to this, though, see my article:

Beyond the "Second Coming"



Monday, February 12, 2018

Was Mohammed’s supposed uncle based on the biblical Omri?


 
Image result for abu lahab uncle muhammad
 
by
 
Damien F. Mackey
 
 
 
 
“In searching the Hebrew Bible for a wicked man whose name resembles Abu Lahab,
one finds Ahab (Hebrew: אַחְאָב), the seventh kings of ancient Israel (r. ca. 885-874 BCE),
son of King Omri and husband of Jezebel of Sidon”.
 
Ercan Celik
 
 
Introduction
 
The biography of the Prophet Mohammed has, as I have shown in:
 
 
 
(and in its subsequent parts) borrowed so many of its bits and pieces from the Bible (both the Old and New Testaments) that it is no wonder that Mohammed has been portrayed as a most remarkable kind of man (verging on a superman), having such a breathtaking career.
The real miracle is that scholars down through the ages have been able to compile a coherent life of the man. The downside of it is - apart from the religious implications - that it is historically a complete shambles.
Better to view the whole thing as a marvellous work of fiction.
 
Now, a Turkish writer, Ercan Celik, believes that he has traced the so-called “uncle” of Mohammed, to the biblical king Omri of Israel:
 
Who were Abu Lahab and His Wife? A View from the Hebrew Bible
 
In The Qur’an and Its Biblical Subtext, G. S. Reynolds observes that
 
…scholars of the Qur’an accept the basic premise of the medieval Islamic sources that the Qur’an is to be explained in light of the life of the Prophet Muhammad…
 
However, he proposes that critical Qur’anic scholarship not depend on prophetic biography (sīrah) or traditional Qur’anic exegesis (tafsīr), but rather,
 
… the Qur’an should be appreciated in light of its conversation with earlier literature, in particular Biblical literature…This argument necessarily involves an examination of both the relationship of Muslim exegetical literature to the Qur’an and the relationship of the Qur’an to Biblical literature.
 
Sūrat al-Masad (Q 111) offers a valuable example for how a Biblical perspective can augment our understanding of the Qur’anic text. The text of the sūrah names its main character Abu Lahab, and mentions that he has a wife, but does not provide any further identifying information. Only extra-Qur’anic literature can give us more details about who he was. In this blog post, I compare how he may be identified through the Islamic literary sources and through the Hebrew Bible.
 
Abu Lahab In Islamic Literature
 
Abu Lahab, meaning “the father of flame,” is identified as the uncle of the prophet Muhammad, ʿAbd al-ʿUzza ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib, nicknamed Abu Lahab on account of his reddish complexion. He is said to have been a rich and proud man, and he and his wife Umm Jamil, sister of Abu Sufyan, are depicted as fierce enemies of Muhammad and the early Muslim community. There are many anecdotes in the Islamic literary sources about their verbal and physical attacks on the prophet. Some Qur’an commentators say that Umm Jamil used to litter Muhammad’s path with harmful thorns of twisted palm leaf fibres, and that this is the historical context for the final verse of Sūrat al-Masad: “Will have upon her neck a halter of palm-fibre” (Q 111:5).
Abu’l-Ahab in Biblical Literature
 
In searching the Hebrew Bible for a wicked man whose name resembles Abu Lahab, one finds Ahab (Hebrew: אַחְאָב), the seventh kings of ancient Israel (r. ca. 885-874 BCE), son of King Omri and husband of Jezebel of Sidon. We could read “Abu Lahab” alternatively, and without substantial change, as “Abu’l-Ahab,” father of Ahab. According to the Hebrew Bible, the father of Ahab is Omri, who is described in 1 Kings 16:25 as having acted “more wickedly than all who were before him.” His son Ahab, in his own time, “married Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Sidonians, and went to serve Baal and worshiped him . . . Thus Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel than all the kings of Israel who were before him” (1 Kings 16:31-33).
…. 
As for Jezebel, it is said that she ordered the killing of prophets (1 Kings 18:4). The prophet Elijah escaped her persecution and with God’s command confronted Ahab with a challenge to the priests of Baal: “You call on the name of your god and I will call on the name of the Lord; the god who answers by fire is indeed God” (18:24). The supporters of Baal called upon their god to send fire to consume their sacrifice, but nothing happened. When Elijah called upon the name of the Lord, fire came down from heaven immediately and consumed their offering.
Eventually Ahab in killed in battle, and when Elisha, successor to the prophet Elijah, anoints Jehu king of Israel, the latter had the house of Ahab killed. Jezebel was captured by her enemies, thrown out of a window, trampled by a horse, and her flesh eaten by dogs.
 
A Comparison of the Qur’anic and Biblical Characters
 
There are some significant parallels between the qur’anic character of Abu Lahab and the biblical character of Abu’l-Ahab. To illustrate these, let us evaluate Sūrat al-Masad in light of the biblical account:
 
  • May the hands of Abu Lahab [Abu’l-Ahab] be ruined and ruined is he. The biblical story of Ahab fits well with this verse, in both linguistic and narrative/thematic terms. The father is invoked for ruin. Omri was the first person to introduce the worship of Baal in Israel, for which his progeny are to be ruined. In Qur’anic Arabic terminology, hands (here, yadā) are symbolic of power and of progeny. The fate of Omri’s progeny is pronounced not so much in the tafsir literature as in the biblical texts.
  • His wealth will not avail him or that which he gained. The Ahab of the Bible seems to have had greater wealth than the Abu Lahab of Islamic tradition; his great wealth failed to prevent his demise by God’s command.
  • He will [enter to] burn in a Fire of [blazing] flame. Hellfire is an eschatalogical concept associated with unbelief, especially with the sort of idolatry instituted by Omri and Ahab.
  • And his wife [as well]—the carrier of firewood. The feature of firewood (ḥaṭab) is key. The challenge at Mount Carmel consisted of sacrificing bulls on firewood in order. We can imagine Jezebel supporting the Baalist priests by collecting the best woods to burn the sacrifice easily. The image of Jezebel carrying firewood makes more sense of this verse than that of Umm Jamil dumping thorns.
  • Around her neck is a rope of [twisted] fiber. Traditional exegetes struggle to explain the meaning of the rope of palm-fiber (masad). It may be better understood in light of the Jezebel story. The term masad appears to be a hapax legomenon in the Qur’an that might have a Hebrew root and be related to Jezebel’s violent death. This term begs for further examination along these lines. ….